Pokazywanie postów oznaczonych etykietą rynek. Pokaż wszystkie posty
Pokazywanie postów oznaczonych etykietą rynek. Pokaż wszystkie posty

Why is the Shiller CAPE So High?

"Why is the Shiller CAPE so high?  In the last several weeks, a number of prominent academics and financial market commentators have attempted to answer this question, to include the inventor of the valuation measure himself, Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller.  In this piece, I’m going to attempt to give a clear answer.

The piece has five parts:
·         In the first part, I’m going to explain why valuations in general are higher than they have been historically.  It’s not just the CAPE that’s historically elevated; the simple TTM P/E ratio is also historically elevated, by a reasonably large amount.
·         In the second part, I’m going to highlight the main reason that the Shiller CAPE has risen relative to the simple TTM P/E over the last two decades: high real EPS growth. I’m going to introduce a schematic that intuitively illustrates why high real EPS growth produces a high Shiller CAPE.
·         In the third part, I’m going to explain how reductions in the dividend payout ratio have contributed to high real EPS growth.  In discussing the dividend payout ratio, I’m going to present a different, potentially more accurate formulation of the Shiller CAPE, a formulation that conducts the calculation based on total return instead of price.  On this formulation, the Shiller CAPE falls by around 10%, from 26.0 to 23.5.
·         In the fourth part, I’m going to explain how a secular uptrend in profit margins has contributed to high real EPS growth over the last two decades.  This effect is the most powerful of all, and is the main reason why the Shiller CAPE and the TTM P/E have diverged in their valuation signals.
·         In the fifth part, I’m going to outline a set of possible future return scenarios that investors at current valuations can reasonably expect.  I’m then going to identify the future return scenario that I find most credible."


The Bond Trap

"The American financial establishment has an incredible ability to celebrate the inconsequential while ignoring the vital. Last week, while the Wall Street Journal pondered how the Fed may set interest rates three to four years in the future (an exercise that David Stockman rightly compared to debating how many angels could dance on the head of a pin), the media almost completely ignored one of the most chilling pieces of financial news that I have ever seen. According to a small story in the Financial Times, some Fed officials would like to require retail owners of bond mutual funds to pay an "exit fee" to liquidate their positions. Come again? That such a policy would even be considered tells us much about the current fragility of our bond market and the collective insanity of layers of unnecessary regulation."

How To Fix High-Frequency Trading

"The recent public outcry over high frequency trading is pointless. Solutions exist. Virtually every comparable market in the world uses them already.

But, some electronic exchanges may not willingly adopt them. Doing so may disrupt their current business model. The incentives are misaligned, and competitors or regulators may need to force the issue to see change. Luckily, the issue to be forced is far simpler than most think.

It’s time to add quality to the matching process. Over thousands of years, every naturally evolved market has headed this direction – from the ancient Greeks to Alibaba.com. It’s time for Wall Street to realize what they lost along the way, and how it can fix far more than just HFT."


Skąd rynek wiedział o szczegółach konstrukcji bomby termojądrowej?

"Trudno zrozumieć dlaczego historia o tym jak jeden z badaczy pracujących w latach 50. w Rand Corporation odgadł rodzaj paliwa użytego w konstrukcji drugiej generacji amerykańskich bomb termojądrowych, nie weszła do kanonu giełdowych anegdot.

Pod koniec 1953 roku Armen Alchian – ekonomista pracujący w Rand Corporation (stworzonym przez amerykański rząd think tanku) próbował dowiedzieć się jakie paliwo zostanie użyte w konstrukcji amerykańskiej bomby termojądrowej. Z oczywistych powodów, żaden ze współpracowników Alchiana z Rand Corporation, którzy dysponowali taką wiedzą, nie chciał przekazać mu tajnych informacji. Alchian dysponował spekulacyjnymi informacjami o tym, że rozważano użycie kilku substancji – litu, berylu, toru i kilku innych.

Z dostępnych publicznie źródeł Alchian zdobył wiedzę o największych producentach tych metali w USA. Sprawdził, które z tych spółek są notowane na giełdzie a następnie zbadał co działo się w ostatnim okresie z ich kursami. (...)"


Czy GPW będzie potrzebna?

"Zacznijmy od banalnej konstatacji, iż zabicie OFE zmienia radykalnie atrakcyjność polskiego rynku z punktu widzenia emitentów. Faktyczne zgaszenie II filara systemu emerytalnego, mizeria III filara oraz ciągle daleki od siły znanej z innych giełd rynek TFI powodują, iż GPW straci ważną przewagę, jaką miała na innymi rynkami w regionie. Zwyczajnie to, co przyciągało zagraniczne spółki na GPW przestaje istnieć. W praktyce oznacza to, iż GPW właśnie przestaje być rynkiem regionalnym a staje się znów rynkiem lokalnym, którego przyszłość w największym stopniu zależy od oferty rodzimej gospodarki. Inaczej rzecz ujmując to, czy pula spółek będzie na GPW rosła zależy teraz głównie od liczby przyszłych debiutów kreowanych przez polską gospodarkę."


Do retail traders suffer from high frequency traders?

"Using a change in regulatory fees in Canada in April 2012 that affected algorithmic quoting activities, we analyze the impact of high frequency quoting and trading on market quality, trader behavior, and trading costs and profits. Following the change, algorithmic message traffic, i.e. the number of orders, trades, and order cancellations, dropped by 30% and the bid-ask spread rose by 9%. Using trader-level data, we attribute this change to message-intensive algorithmic traders reducing their activity, and we show that their reduced activity had a negative impact on retail traders’ intraday returns, in particular on their returns from limit orders. We further find that institutional traders’ intraday returns from market orders increased."


Framework for Understanding Market Tops and Bottoms

"Today the market shows many of the elements that are present near market tops. In particular, sentiment is extremely bullish, investors are long and leveraged, and valuations are extended on a wide variety of measures. However, leading economic indicators are still not negative, and so far breadth and technicals have not deteriorated. The medium-term stock market returns are likely to be negative due to excessive valuation, but there is no imminent sign of a medium-term market top.

Tops are a process, not a single event. They tend to last a long period of time, and markets whipsaw traders and disappoint bears and short sellers. For example, many signs of a market top were clearly visible in late 1998, but it was not until the end of 2000 that most major market indices started to collapse. Likewise, many elements of a market top were evident in late 2006, but markets didn’t begin to collapse until very early 2008. "


Merge or Die: Slow Economy Sheds New Light on M&A

"Merger activity will get a much-needed lift when companies realize that acquisitions are the only way to expand in a slow-growth economy."

"M&A has long been a business that runs on optimism. The effort required to buy another organization — negotiate a price, perform effective due diligence, resolve legal and regulatory requirements and defeat other bidders — is daunting and time-consuming, high drama and remarkable tedium. The machinery of M&A is large, complex and fragile, a fluid constellation of bankers, lawyers, accountants, consultants, corporate executives, directors and investors of all kinds. It is both a mechanism of change and an intricate set of financial, organizational and legal technologies. Perhaps the greatest and most commonly overlooked aspect of M&A happens when the deal is done: postmerger integration, or effectively knitting two corporate entities into one.

None of M&A is easy, and the risks are considerable — too large, apparently, for many companies still focused on disaster and seemingly content to accumulate cash, passing some of it to shareholders when they grow restive. This is a big change. The modern era of M&A, which began in the mid-’70s and was characterized by shareholder governance and deregulated markets, has been both cyclical and expansionary. Recessions reduced the size and number of M&A deals for two or three years only to see them roar back, each wave mightier than the last. What drove those successively higher waves was the expansion of M&A into the middle market and into the developed, then emerging, economies. Throughout this period M&A was broadly tamed and routinized, moving beyond an activity that once seemed to belong to cowboys, pirates or, most famously, barbarians."


Refuting The Biggest "Recovery" Lies In Four Simple Charts

"US profits are growing, companies have underinvested and have no choice but to spend more on CapEx, and corporations have much less debt than they did during the crisis thanks to a massive cash build up."
"These are the generic go to explanations by soundbity talking heads for why the US recovery is gaining traction with US corporations, if not so much Joe Sixpack, and why companies are still cheap. There is one problem: they are all wrong.
As SocGen's Andrew Lapthorne shows conclusively, "US profits are not growing, companies are over not underinvesting (they may in fact have overinvested), and corporates are carrying more (not less) net debt than they were in 2009. It would appear that many believe the opposite to be true, yet corporate report and accounts data seems to say otherwise." But hey- stocks are at record highs, right, and the market is never wrong (except when it is), so who cares."


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-17/refuting-biggest-recovery-lies-four-simple-charts

Wall Street's Brightest Minds Reveal the most important charts of the year

Zestawienie 126 wykresów od Business Insider, czyli na co patrzy rynek na koniec 2013 roku.

"Here they are: the most important charts of the year. 
We asked our favourite portfolio managers, strategists, analysts, and economists across the Street for the charts that they deem the most important right now, and this is what they sent us.
Much of the focus is on the 10-year Treasury yield — where does it go, and what is the read-across for other financial markets around the globe? Many are focused on the stock market as well, the consensus being that indices will rise to new highs again in 2014.
But there are a lot of other things going on as well."


Everything You Wanted To Know About Equity Market Valuations (And Didn't Know To Ask)

Bardzo polecam zapoznanie się z raportem opisanym w linku, ponieważ w przyjazny sposób zwraca uwagę na parę kwestii związanych z horyzontem inwestycji oraz czynnikami wyceny rynkowej jako całości. Dodatkowo można tam znaleźć ciekawe wartości dla dzisiejszych poziomów amerykańskiego rynku i gospodarki. Link do pełnego tekstu raportu jest na dole tekstu (tylko fragment na Zerohedge).

"This publication tries to assess the following questions:
1. What kind of return can be reasonably expected from stock market investments? Is that rate sustainable?
2. What kind of simple tools exist to tell if the stock market is cheap or expensive?
3. Are stock market returns mean-reverting?
4. Are we going to continue to see similar cyclical fluctuations in the future, or are we in the midst of a structural break?
I will try to keep things as simple as possible. Finance doesn't have to be complex (people make it complex)."


Surprise - US Policy Reduces Trading Volumes AND Liquididty In The US Treasury Market - BRAVO

"The US Federal Reserve Bank has been easing quantitatively (QE) for 4 years now, since 2009.  Over this period, average daily trading volume in the US Treasury market has reduced from 500bln 10yr equivalents per day to 350bln 10yr equivalents.  350bln 10yr equivs may still seem like a big number...but this is a 30% decrease in trading volumes, and that is a reduction not only in volume, but liquidity.  Some readers out there might think"so what?" or "whats the big deal if the US Treasury market is less liquid than it used to be?"  The answer rests in the ultimate lenders of capital, and the structure of the Treasury market which is of great concern to participants of this market.  Investors (yes, a rarely used word these days) prefer to invest in assets that are liquid, especially when that asset is designated as a "risk free" asset.  Liquidity = ability to enter / exit at tight spreads without affecting the market price for the security.  (...)

The market is a discounting function, in that it discounts future expected values in the current price of assets.  This means that ultimately, when the market realizes that the Fed cannot exit its QE position (i'm amazed this hasn't happened yet), the discounting function requires the price of UST debt to drop, yields to rise, and the currency to cheapen.  And here is where the Fed holding a sizable portion of all outstanding UST debt becomes both a problem, solution, and problem again."


W poszukiwaniu przewagi

"Pierwszy ze wspomnianych artykułów informuje o zainteresowaniu technologiami wywiadowczymi, konkretnie obrazowaniem satelitarnym w celu szybszego dostępu do informacji rynkowych lub uzyskania dokładniejszych informacji rynkowych.

Fundusze hedge analizują obrazy satelitarne parkingów przy dużych sieciach handlowych w celu szacowania przychodów na podstawie liczby klientów odwiedzających sklepy. FT informuje także, że obrazowanie satelitarne używane jest do monitorowania działalności górniczej czy rolniczej a nawet, z użyciem obrazowania w podczerwieni, do monitorowania jakości upraw."


Spisek OFE w dniu jednej wiedźmy

"Jeśli na polskiej giełdzie OFE od 13 lat były nieustannie inwestorem, który raz na jakiś czas kupuje i raczej nigdy nie sprzedaje, a od 2014 OFE mają przekształcić się w inwestora, który raz na jakiś czas sprzedaje i niekoniecznie ma za co kupować, to faktycznie jest to istotna przesłanka, żeby zmienić pogląd na temat polskiego rynku. A jak rynek zmienia pogląd, to nim trzęsie."


Dark-pool trading reaches record levels in Europe

"European share trading taking place in anonymous, off-exchange venues known as "dark pools" reached its highest-ever level in July, amid lower volatility and a growing proliferation of high-frequency trading on the platforms.

About 10.3% of all European equities trading last month took place on these venues, according to data from Thomson Reuters. (...)

Dark pools do not display prices to the market, and allow investors to place orders anonymously to help minimise market impact. Trading often shifts to the venues in quieter periods, when institutions have increased confidence in trading away from exchanges or 'lit' markets."


The Intelligent Investor: Saving Investors From Themselves

By Jason Zweig: "I was once asked, at a journalism conference, how I defined my job. I said: My job is to write the exact same thing between 50 and 100 times a year in such a way that neither my editors nor my readers will ever think I am repeating myself.
That’s because good advice rarely changes, while markets change constantly. The temptation to pander is almost irresistible. And while people need good advice, what they want is advice that sounds good."


A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Equilibrium

"There are times when the markets do not seem to be following the script properly, and we are left wondering whether we are dealing with a temporary anomaly or a more permanent problem. Today we are faced with one of these problems: the persistently high prot margins of U.S. corporations. High prot margins should not persist in a mean-reverting world, and yet protability in the U.S. has been higher than long-term averages for most of the last 20 years, oddly pretty close to the same length of time that the U.S. market has been trading above replacement cost. 

At rst thought, it may not seem that odd that high protability is associated with an expensive stock market – after all, shouldn’t investors be willing to pay more for assets that achieve a high return? But high valuations imply a low cost of equity capital, which should encourage corporations to issue more equity, and a high return on capital should encourage corporations to do more investing. These pressures should gradually push the cost of capital up and the return on capital down. But in the period since the mid-1990s, stock issuance has been down and corporate investment has fallen as well, in apparent contravention of the basic rules of capitalism. A high return on capital that occurred simultaneously with a high cost of capital – that is a market selling below replacement cost – would make sense because there is no discrepancy to arbitrage. The current situation is not supposed to happen, which makes it tricky for us to understand exactly when it will end."

Uwaga - to jest drugi artykuł w tym pliku pdf.


A Couple of Things You Should Know About the Stock Market

"We all know the Federal Reserve is manipulating the stock market. It does so in two ways:
1. Financial repression: lowering the yield on "safe" assets such as Treasury bonds to negative rates (adjusted for inflation, you're paying the government to park your capital in its bonds), which drives capital into so-called risk assets that offer a yield, for example dividend-paying stocks and rental housing.
2. POMO and bulk purchases of futures contracts on the S&P 500 before the market opens. Studies have found that the majority of gains in the stock market occur on POMO (one of the Fed's quantitative easing programs) days and on days when large lots of E-Mini futures contracts are purchased, pushing the markets higher at the open.

Everyone knows markets in the U.S. and Japan are levitating higher as money is created and pushed (via currency devaluation and financial repression) into stocks.

What nobody knows is the eventual consequence of all this manipulation. Right now the consensus is "don't fight the Fed," meaning stay invested in stocks because they're going higher.
In less-manipulated markets, we would expect the consensus to eventually be punished, simply because the market rarely rewards the majority for long. But in central-planning manipulated markets, the feedback that is the foundation of open markets has been suppressed."

Piotr Kuczyński: OFE czeka gorąca wiosna

"OFE znowu znalazły się w centrum uwagi. W ustawie z 2011 roku, która między innymi obniżała składkę do OFE z 7,3 do 2,3 proc. wpisano podniesienie składki (do 2,8 proc. w tym roku – docelowo d 3,5 proc.) i przegląd sytuacji w wyniku zmiany jej wysokości. Już kilka tygodni wcześniej do mediów dotarł (jak podejrzewam kontrolowany) przeciek. Twierdzono, że rząd chce na 10 lat przed wiekiem każdego Polaka emerytalnym przesunąć środki zapisane na jego koncie z OFE do ZUS po to, żeby tam nie były narażone na rynkowe ryzyko. Ta informacja rozpoczęła dyskusję, która zapewne (tak jak w 2011 roku) będzie bardzo gorąca. (...)
Przy okazji powiem, że do osiągnięcia wyników OFE wystarczyłoby kilka osób, a nie 14 funduszy, w których zatrudnienie znajduje wielu ludzi. Z Karaibów można dawać zlecenia odzwierciedlające WIG20 i kupując obligacje. Nawiasem mówiąc interesujące jest to, że nic nie wiemy o wynagrodzeniach w OFE. Ja nawet nie znam ludzi, którzy tam pracują. Zatrudnienie i płace najwyraźniej objęte są tajemnicą, a przeczcież te fundusze obracają kapitałami w ramach państwowego systemu emerytalnego. Struktura zatrudnienia, ludzi i ich zarobki nie powinny być tajemnicą.

Exchange-Traded Funds, Market Structure, and the Flash Crash

“Exchange-Traded Funds, Market Structure, and the Flash Crash” by Ananth Madhavan.
The author analyzes the relationship between market structure and the flash crash. The proliferation of trading venues has resulted in a market that is more fragmented than ever. The author constructs measures to capture fragmentation and shows that they are important in explaining extreme price movements. New market structure reforms should help mitigate such market disruptions in the future but have not eliminated the possibility of another flash crash, albeit with a different catalyst